Imam Journal of Applied Sciences

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9--15

Psychologic stress and burnout among dental staff: A cross-sectional survey


Abdullah Mohammed Alzahem1, Yasmeen Abdulhadi Alhaizan2, Latifa Yousef Algudaibi3, Ragad Mohammed Albani2, Abdulrahman Majed Aljuraisi4, Meshal Khaled Alaqeel5 
1 King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3 College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
4 College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
5 King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Saud University; College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Latifa Yousef Algudaibi
College of Dentistry, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Backgraound: Professional burnout, a prolonged response to stress, may affect standards of patient care. Burnout is defined as emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment (PA). Aim: The aim of the current study is to identify and compare the psychologic stress and burnout levels among different job titles and specialties in the dental services department. We also examined the effects of marital status, age, and sex on stress and burnout levels. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study conducted in the department of dental services at a tertiary medical complex. Materials and Methods: A convenient sampling approach was used to distribute the questionnaire in the dental services department (n = 177, response rate = 88.5%). Two-validated questionnaires, the Psychological Stress Measure-9, and Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human Services Survey, were used. Statistical Analysis: SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for data analysis. P<0.05 was considered statically significant. Results: The mean (± standard deviation) stress level was 32.6 (±11.43), with the highest stress levels seen in consultants and residents (39.17% and 38.33%, respectively). Hygienists and technicians exhibited the highest lack of PA (24.53%), consultants exhibited the highest EE (24.64%), and residents exhibited the highest impersonal response toward patients (26.67%). Conclusion: Participants with the job title “Consultant” or “Resident” are the most stressed and burnt-out dental personnel. Specialty, sex, age, and marital status were not identified as risk factors for stress and burnout in our study. Stress and burnout should be reduced to maintain standards of patient care.


How to cite this article:
Alzahem AM, Alhaizan YA, Algudaibi LY, Albani RM, Aljuraisi AM, Alaqeel MK. Psychologic stress and burnout among dental staff: A cross-sectional survey.Imam J Appl Sci 2020;5:9-15


How to cite this URL:
Alzahem AM, Alhaizan YA, Algudaibi LY, Albani RM, Aljuraisi AM, Alaqeel MK. Psychologic stress and burnout among dental staff: A cross-sectional survey. Imam J Appl Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 28 ];5:9-15
Available from: http://www.e-ijas.org/article.asp?issn=2589-0603;year=2020;volume=5;issue=1;spage=9;epage=15;aulast=Alzahem;type=0